(no subject)
May. 12th, 2009 01:36 amFrom a discussion elsewhere:
"As much as I would like to believe that the people who dislike me do so because they are idiots, chances are that's not the case. There are social influences that will cause any person to behave or speak less intelligently than she is capable of; given that, idiocy is no explanation if you do not explain what engenders idiocy and makes it momentarily acceptable. There's a saying that goes, 'Do not attribute to malice what you can attribute to stupidity.' But from my life, I've learned that the better maxim is, 'Attribute nothing to malice or stupidity.'"
"As much as I would like to believe that the people who dislike me do so because they are idiots, chances are that's not the case. There are social influences that will cause any person to behave or speak less intelligently than she is capable of; given that, idiocy is no explanation if you do not explain what engenders idiocy and makes it momentarily acceptable. There's a saying that goes, 'Do not attribute to malice what you can attribute to stupidity.' But from my life, I've learned that the better maxim is, 'Attribute nothing to malice or stupidity.'"
no subject
Date: 2009-05-12 12:55 pm (UTC)The Black Box theory of humanity helps me a lot when I have to be diplomatic--you can't know what's going on inside the other person's head, but most people assume they do, because they percieve the outside behavior.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-25 04:29 am (UTC)That Black Box theory is really only good as a first-order approximation (I initially wanted to say zeroth-order, but the point of zero knowledge would probably be a critical point (in the mathematical sense) in any reasonable graph here), meaning that it's fine for low values of whatever quantity is at stake. Say, for small values of the effort expended to know another person. But I have had enough moments of insight to claim that the theory is no better than an approximation -- one particular experience, of describing another person's inner world without having it described to me beforehand, stands out as a counterexample.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-12 01:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-25 04:34 am (UTC)This gets into a pet distinction of mine, that between interpretations and theories... the fact the distinction (attempts to) explain being how much more difficult interpretations are to argue against.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-12 05:26 pm (UTC)However your method also works!
no subject
Date: 2009-05-25 04:30 am (UTC)