General knowledge
Jun. 30th, 2004 06:21 pmThe following is a page of notes from my computer.
Perlocutions, vagueness,
Knowledge and understanding are different.
Understanding requires a good imagination, knowledge requires...?
A person who misuses knowledge claims to have knowledge without being in a position to know about the subject.
A person who misuses understanding claims to have understanding without imagining the subject.
I see the problem that plagues an age, and I find it suffices to stay away.
Use of "it", "so" as pointers into vagueness.
Consider vagueness a preservation strategy of language.
A section on locutions, illocutions, and perlocutions.
Check Austin: does he say that everything's a locution?
It takes two people to make sense.
Perlocutions, vagueness,
Knowledge and understanding are different.
Understanding requires a good imagination, knowledge requires...?
A person who misuses knowledge claims to have knowledge without being in a position to know about the subject.
A person who misuses understanding claims to have understanding without imagining the subject.
I see the problem that plagues an age, and I find it suffices to stay away.
Use of "it", "so" as pointers into vagueness.
Consider vagueness a preservation strategy of language.
A section on locutions, illocutions, and perlocutions.
Check Austin: does he say that everything's a locution?
It takes two people to make sense.
no subject
Date: 2004-06-30 08:12 pm (UTC)The understanding that elapses between two people is a unique entity of its own, isn't it? Although people can truly understand each other, they cannot see things through an unfiltered perspective... so the understanding people come to can be unique to the pair, and be its own moment in time, as it were.
GUILEN
no subject
Date: 2004-06-30 09:27 pm (UTC)